Summary: Application owners carry accountability for their app's access governance — but most IGA tools run centralized reviews that bypass their deeper context entirely. Oleria, an AI-native identity security & governance platform, solves this with application-scoped access reviews that give app owners an RBAC-isolated, evidence-driven view of their application's access, AI-recommended decisions, and a direct path to revoke — without routing every step through the IAM team.
Application owners are accountable for their app's access governance, but they don't run the reviews. IAM runs centralized reviews that cover all apps shallowly; the app owner's deeper context is lost. The result: reviews are formally complete but don't reflect what the app owner actually knows about access need.
Empowering app owners requires giving them a scoped review interface, with usage evidence for their app, recommended decisions, and a path to act — without IAM in the loop for every step. Most IGA tools weren't designed for delegated app-owner reviews; the review is centralized by default.
Oleria's three-signal recommendation engine works across every campaign type, including application-scoped reviews — so the app owner sees the right defaults for their context, not a one-size-fits-all rule.
Each app has its own owner and cadence. IAM oversees rather than driving every review.
The audit trail captures every decision; IAM has visibility. Coming: co-approval gate on privileged decisions.
Shipped: app-owner RBAC, per-app campaigns, three-signal evidence, bulk-accept, audit trail. Coming: per-app risk-tiered cadence and IAM co-approval on privileged decisions.
Through RBAC in the governance app. The app owner gets a role scoped to their application's identities and access reviews only.
Because they have the deepest context about access need for their app. Centralized IAM reviews cover all apps shallowly.
