Enterprise AI Copilot Identity Risks | Oleria eBook

The Microsoft Admins' Guide to M365 Copilot Identity Management and Security

An identity-centric approach to protecting sensitive data in the AI era

Featured event: A CISO’s take

Join Jim Alkove and Ramy Houssaini to learn how forward-thinking security teams are addressing Enterprise AI Copilot risks.

40%
of Microsoft 365 Copilot rollouts are being delayed due to security concerns
Microsoft Security, 2021 State of Cloud Permissions Risks Reports

Data security concerns are stalling M365 copilot deployments

The rapid emergence of enterprise AI-powered assistants — or copilots — is already revolutionizing the way we work and interact with information. These intelligent assistants, powered by advanced AI models, can automate tasks and provide insights that boost productivity, foster creativity, and improve decision-making.

Yet, despite incredible hype and growing enterprise investments in AI assistants like Microsoft 365 Copilot, increasing numbers of enterprises have put the brakes on their copilot deployments because of data security and privacy concerns. In fact, Gartner found that 40% of rollouts of M365 Copilot are being delayed due to security concerns related to oversharing.

40%
of Microsoft 365 Copilot rollouts are being delayed due to security concerns
Guidance for Mitigating Microsoft 365 Copilot Access Risks (Gartner 2024)

Data classification (alone) isn’t enough

Security leaders (and, increasingly, the C-suite) are wary of AI copilots exposing unclassified sensitive information, prompting rapid data discovery and classification efforts. But a solely data-centric approach faces significant limitations. The sheer volume of data, coupled with the rapid genesis of new data, make classification a neverending challenge. Moreover, AI models operate at speeds far exceeding data discovery and classification, making it a perpetual game of catch-up.

Furthermore, even when all sensitive and valuable data has been correctly classified, that does not mean it is safe from unintentional exposure by an AI assistant like M365 Copilot. Organizations must distinguish between active and stale data, verify classification accuracy, and determine appropriate actions — all demanding substantial time and resources.

The identity-centric approach to mitigating AI copilot security risk

While data classification remains vital, the other side of this equation — permissions and access management — has been dangerously overlooked. AI copilots operate within the existing permissions framework, meaning that if a user has broad access to sensitive data, the copilot inherits that access and can surface that data, regardless of classification. This creates a critical blind spot: over-permissioned accounts become the perfect vector for unintentional data leaks via AI assistants.

Real-World Example:

An employee with over-permissioned access to financial records uses M365 Copilot to summarize “all documents related to Project X.” The copilot will happily serve up a summary that includes sensitive financial information — even if those financial records are classified and the employee should not have ever seen them in the first place.

Given the challenges and the scale of modern data environments, an identity-centric approach, which focuses on controlling access based on user identities and permissions, offers a more agile, proactive and sustainable path to securing sensitive information. By implementing least-privilege principles, organizations can limit the scope of AI assistant access. This strategy empowers security teams to focus on managing access rather than endlessly chasing the ever-expanding volume of data.

Rampant over-permissioning is the norm

Years of rapid digital transformation — and, most explicitly, the adoption of “permissive-by-default” productivity platforms that encourage easy sharing and collaboration — have made over-permissioning and over-exposure of enterprise data the norm in the typical organization. The magnitude of the issue was masked by the relative complexity of information discovery. Before AI copilots, users had to take deliberate action to find and use over-exposed information. Even prior attempts at enterprise search tools, especially those reliant on metadata tagging and traditional indexing algorithms, failed to surface the true extent of the over-exposed data risk.

But an AI assistant excels at discovering and leveraging every accessible resource — and finding subtle connections between data, unintentionally surfacing sensitive information in the process. These tools have the speed, semantic understanding, and contextual-awareness earlier approaches lacked. Given unchecked access to an unprecedented amount of enterprise data, this fundamental strength of M365 Copilot will turn the rampant over-provisioning that’s common in most enterprises into active security vulnerabilities, potentially exposing highly sensitive, confidential, and valuable data.

How big is the over-permissioning problem?

95%

of standing access permissions go unused

(Microsoft)
90%

of identities utilize only

5%

of granted permissions

(Microsoft)
98%

of permissions granted to non-human identities have not been used for at least 90 days.

(Sysdig)

The unintended risks of Microsoft 365 Copilot

An AI assistant can unwittingly exploit over-provisioned access and misconfigured permissions. Combined with lax governance and inconsistent lifecycle management, this results in unintended exposure of sensitive data that can lead to loss of competitive advantage, reputational harm, and penalties due to non-compliance.

Here are just a few of the dangerous scenarios that can result:

Unauthorized & unintentional access to confidential documents

Sensitive employee details may be inadvertently surfaced and exposed to unauthorized parties. For example, giving the right prompt and improper SharePoint site permissioning, an employee can query M365 Copilot about org structure and potentially receive details on role salaries, upcoming personnel changes, and other insights never intended for their level.

Example prompt:
“Show me all files created by the finance department in the last month.”

Exposure of sensitive communications

Email messages, meeting recordings, and chats are all fair game and within reach for M365 Copilot. Without the proper permissioning, sensitive information within a CEO communication could surface in the results to a query made by a junior employee.

Example prompt:
“Summarize the discussions around the recent budget cuts.”

More real-world M365 Copilot risks

  • Exposure of strategic information from meeting recordings
  • Unintended sharing of compensation or other PII data during routine searches
  • Cross-application data leakage through misconfigured integrations
  • Compliance violations for GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA regulated data

The speed vs. security dilemma

A big source of risk is not the AI copilot itself, but rather the typical fashion in which the tool is implemented. Businesses are under immense pressure to move fast, innovate, and adapt. This leads to a strong bias toward speed when rolling out any new SaaS tools. But this longstanding bias — where rapid implementation overshadows robust security measures — sets the stage for AI copilots to inadvertently expose sensitive data.

Rapid Onboarding & Incomplete Offboarding

Companies need to onboard employees, partners, and customers quickly. This rush often leads to shortcuts in security procedures, like:

  • Insufficient identity verification
  • Granting excessive access privileges by default
  • Relying on weak passwords or shared accounts
Simplified Role-Based Access Provisioning (RBAC)

While RBAC is a foundational security practice, oversimplification can create risks:

  • Broad roles with too many permissions increase the potential damage if an account is compromised.
  • Lack of granular control over data access within a role can lead to unintended data exposure.
  • Over-permissioning in modern apps with easy sharing and "privilege creep" due to unrevoked access.
Decentralized SaaS Application Deployment

The explosion of cloud-based applications (SaaS) and data repositories empowers teams to work independently, but it also creates a sprawling and complex IT environment:

  • Decentralization makes it difficult to maintain a consistent security posture across all applications.
  • Shadow IT (unsanctioned apps) can proliferate, flying under the radar of security teams.
  • Third-party apps/plug-ins in platforms like Teams lead to permission creep.
Complex Application Interconnections

Modern business processes rely on applications that integrate and share data with each other.

  • This creates intricate webs of access points, making it hard to track data flow and enforce security policies.
  • A vulnerability in one application can potentially compromise the entire interconnected system.
  • AI copilot platforms' plugin ecosystems grant broad access to potentially sensitive information.

How Microsoft 365 Copilot exposes access gaps

The unique capabilities of M365 Copilot and similar AI assistants deliver tremendous benefits to enterprise users — but also bring the hidden exposure risks, transforming access control weaknesses into active security vulnerabilities:

Capability

Integration of data across multiple sources

By accessing and processing data from diverse sources like emails, documents, and meeting recordings, M365 Copilot can uncover hidden connections and patterns, providing more relevant and contextual search responses, which can be beneficial for tasks like fraud detection.

Automatic inclusion of supplementary information

M365 Copilot strives to provide complete and informative responses. To achieve this, it automatically includes supplementary information from various sources.

Multimedia parsing

M365 Copilot possesses the unique capability to parse multimedia content, such as video and audio files, without requiring explicit transcription. This allows it to extract information and insights from a wider range of sources, enhancing its ability to provide comprehensive and contextually relevant responses.

Exposure Risk

Hidden connections

This cross-referencing of data across expansive access also poses an exposure risk as it might reveal sensitive or private information that was not intended to be linked.

Eagerness to provide complete answers

The eagerness of M365 Copilot to provide comprehensive answers can lead it to include information that should remain confidential. This can inadvertently expose private data or trade secrets.

Unintentional information leak

Sensitive information contained within video and audio files, including conversations, presentations, or discussions, can be unintentionally extracted and potentially exposed, even if that information was never explicitly documented in text form. This raises concerns about data privacy and the potential for inadvertent disclosure of confidential information.

Conventional security solutions don’t fit the AI age

Traditional security tools, technologies and strategies are struggling to keep up with the rapidly evolving challenges presented by AI assistants. In short, these conventional solutions fail to provide the comprehensive visibility needed to uncover, remediate, and mitigate the risk of oversharing:

Data Protection

Data lifecycle management and governance are not new approaches to enterprise data protection. Most of these solutions focus innovation on classification and policy management instead of access control. Even so, the ability to keep pace with data discovery, classification, and sensitivity labeling is challenging enough. The speed of AI copilots and its near instantaneous ability to uncover and connect insights from your enterprise corpus means you can not rely solely on data protection to prevent oversharing.

Traditional Identity and Access Management (IAM)

Unintended data exposure is often the side effect of identity-security challenges. Many existing IAM tools lack the full end-to-end visibility (across on-prem, cloud, and SaaS apps) to provide a complete picture of access management. Instead, these tools place a heavy burden on IT security teams to manually stitch together separate threads of visibility, often from different tools, to gain full situational awareness. Furthermore, traditional IAM tools are unable to monitor access utilization. Without real-time visibility into access rights and its usage across the digital estate, IT security teams will struggle to balance enforcement of least privilege and supporting business productivity. 

Native Controls and Third-Party Add-Ons

Virtually all productivity platforms, such as Microsoft SharePoint or OneDrive, offer native security controls and auditing. Native capabilities benefit from deep understanding of the idiosyncrasies and behaviors of their unique platforms, however they create silos of awareness and posture management. Once data leaves the platform or is accessed in non-traditional ways, native controls become blindspots. Third-party add-ons help expand visibility, but must be able to scale across the entire enterprise, from on-prem to cloud to SaaS apps, to fully understand your exposure risk.

Understanding your copilot risk exposure

Deploying M365 Copilot within an organization introduces a new dimension to identity security. To effectively manage and mitigate potential risks, it's crucial to adopt a proactive and comprehensive approach to risk assessment. This involves asking critical questions and developing a deep understanding of the interplay between M365 Copilot’s capabilities and existing security infrastructure.

Here's a breakdown of key areas to address:

1. Data access scope

  • Which employees can access sensitive data through the copilot? This requires mapping all users who have access to  M365 Copilot and identifying the specific data they can access through these tools. This includes direct access to sensitive information as well as indirect access through queries and commands that the copilot may execute. It's essential to understand the potential for users to inadvertently or maliciously expose sensitive data via their interactions with M365 Copilot.
  • How did they obtain these permissions? Trace the origin of access permissions to identify potential vulnerabilities in the access provisioning process. Were these permissions granted explicitly, inherited through role assignments, or acquired through other means? Analyzing the permission granting process can reveal weaknesses in security policies and practices.
  • Is their access appropriate for current roles? Regularly review user access privileges to ensure they align with current job responsibilities and business needs. Employees may change roles, projects may evolve, or access requirements may shift over time. Failing to adjust permissions accordingly can lead to excessive access and increased risk.
  • Are they actively using these permissions? Monitor access utilization to identify any anomalies or suspicious activity. Are users accessing data or performing actions that are outside the scope of their typical duties? This analysis can help detect insider threats, unauthorized access attempts, or even misconfigured M365 Copilot settings.

2. Risk quantification

  • Potential unauthorized data exposure scope: Assess the potential impact of a data breach involving M365 Copilot. What types of sensitive data could be exposed? How many individuals would be affected? Understanding the scope of potential exposure helps prioritize mitigation efforts and develop incident response plans.
  • Compliance violation likelihood: Evaluate the risk of non-compliance with relevant data protection regulations and industry standards. Could M365 Copilot lead to violations of privacy laws, data security requirements, or industry-specific guidelines? Assessing compliance risks is crucial for avoiding legal and financial penalties.
  • Financial impact of security incidents: Estimate the financial consequences of a security incident involving M365 Copilot. This includes direct costs, such as legal fees, regulatory fines, and customer notification expenses, as well as indirect costs, such as reputational damage and loss of business. Quantifying the financial impact helps justify investments in security measures and demonstrates the importance of risk mitigation to stakeholders.
  • Operational disruption costs: Consider the potential for M365 Copilot-related security incidents to disrupt business operations. Could a breach lead to system downtime, service interruptions, or delays in project completion? Assessing the potential for operational disruption highlights the need for robust security controls and disaster recovery plans.

By thoroughly addressing these questions, organizations can gain a clearer picture of their copilot risk exposure and develop targeted strategies to mitigate those risks effectively. This proactive approach is essential for ensuring the secure and responsible deployment of M365 Copilot in the enterprise.

Making the business case for change

Organizations today are focused on the strong business case for implementing and expanding utilization of AI assistants. But for the IT, security and compliance teams that bear the burden of mitigating the inherent risks of these AI tools, it’s critical to build a solid business case for a modernized approach to identity and access that’s fit for the AI era.

Investing in a modern identity security strategy is not just about mitigating risks; it's about unlocking the full potential of AI while creating tangible business value. By embracing AI-driven security, organizations can confidently navigate the evolving threat landscape, protect their valuable assets, and drive innovation in the digital age.

Cost Savings

Reduced breach risk:
Proactively identify and mitigate access vulnerabilities to reduce the risk of data breaches and associated financial losses.

Eliminated manual access reviews:
Automate IAM processes to free up IT and security teams to focus on strategic initiatives.   

Decreased incident response time:
Real-time monitoring and automated remediation minimize the impact of security breaches and reduce downtime.   

Lower compliance costs:
Automate access controls and provide detailed audit trails to simplify compliance and reduce costs.    

Value Creation

Accelerated AI adoption:
Provide a secure foundation for AI deployment to accelerate adoption and realize the full potential of AI technologies.

Improved operational efficiency:
Streamline IAM processes to reduce administrative overhead and improve operational efficiency. 

Enhanced security posture:
Provide comprehensive visibility, dynamic access control, and continuous monitoring to strengthen security posture. 

Competitive advantage:
Enable secure AI adoption to gain a competitive advantage through innovation.

Action plan for security and IT leaders:
Navigating the AI copilot revolution

The integration of AI assistants like M365 Copilot into the enterprise presents both exciting opportunities and unique security challenges. To effectively manage these challenges and ensure the secure adoption of AI, security and IT leaders need a proactive and comprehensive action plan. This plan should encompass immediate steps, medium-term initiatives, and a long-term strategy to address the evolving landscape of AI-driven identity security.

Immediate Steps

  1. Conduct access audit: Audit all user access privileges across your IT environment.
  2. Identify critical data assets: Create an inventory of sensitive data and its location.
  3. Review current IAM capabilities: Evaluate if your IAM tools can handle AI copilot access.
  4. Assess copilot deployment risks: Identify potential security risks tied to AI copilot use.

Medium-Term Initiatives

  1. Implement modern identity security solutions: Invest in solutions designed for AI copilot access.
  2. Enforce least-privilege principles: Ensure minimum necessary access for each user and each asset.
  3. Deploy automated access management: Automate user provisioning and access requests.
  4. Enhance monitoring capabilities: Improve real-time threat detection and response

Long-Term Strategy

  1. Build dynamic access control systems: Develop systems that adapt to changing risks.
  2. Integrate AI-powered security tools: Utilize AI for threat detection and response.
  3. Develop comprehensive security metrics: Track and measure security program effectiveness.
  4. Create sustainable compliance frameworks: Ensure ongoing compliance with regulations.

Don't get left behind: Secure your AI advantage

AI assistants are no longer a futuristic concept; they are here, transforming the way we work and offering unprecedented opportunities for innovation and efficiency. But this transformative power comes with a critical caveat: traditional security approaches are simply not equipped to handle the unique challenges posed by AI.

To truly unlock the potential of a tool like M365 Copilot and gain a competitive edge, organizations must act now to modernize their identity security. This means moving beyond static, role-based access control and embracing dynamic, least-privilege models. It requires adopting advanced IAM solutions that provide clear answers to the fundamental questions of identity security:

  • Who has access to what resources?
  • How was access obtained?
  • Is the access appropriate for current roles?
  • How is access being utilized?

Failing to address these questions leaves organizations vulnerable to data breaches, compliance violations, and reputational damage. The time for complacency is over. By embracing a proactive, AI-driven approach to identity security, organizations can confidently harness the transformative power of M365 Copilot while safeguarding their most valuable assets. The future of work belongs to those who can innovate securely. The time to act is now.

How Oleria securely unlocks Microsoft 365 Copilot

Oleria offers a unique, AI-driven approach to identity security, purpose-built for the modern workplace. Our comprehensive and automated solution provides the visibility, control, and intelligence you need to confidently and securely deploy M365 Copilot.

With Oleria, you can:

  • Gain real-time visibility across all systems, including on-premises infrastructure, cloud applications, and AI copilots.
  • Map out the complete chain of access inheritance to identify and address unintended access pathways.
  • Track historical access patterns to identify anomalies, detect suspicious activity, and understand the context of access requests.
  • Leverage detailed usage analytics to identify unused accounts, over-privileged users, and potential security risks.
  • Rapidly identify and remove excess permissions, ensuring that users and AI copilots have only the access they need.
  • Continuously monitor access activity, looking for anomalies and potential security violations.
  • Enforce access policies in real-time, preventing unauthorized access attempts.
  • Maintain compliance with relevant regulations and industry standards.

Don't let security worries hold back the promise of AI assistants. Oleria provides the foundation you need to confidently embrace the future of work.

Watch a recorded demo to learn how Oleria addresses identity security risks unique to Microsoft 365 Copilot, empowering your organization to securely leverage AI-powered productivity.

Oleria reimagines identity security, providing organizations with the clarity and control needed to protect their most critical assets.

Executive Brief

Solving the non-human identity crisis: Securing your organization's invisible workforce

By the numbers

80:1
NHIs outnumber human identities by as much as 80 to 1
80%
Percentage of breaches involve compromised identities
46%
Organizations that have experienced a security breach related to NHIs
2 .7
Average number of NHIrelated security incidents per enterprise in the past year
40%
Repositories with Copilot enabled were found to have a 40% higher incidence rate of secret leaks compared to those without AI assistance
15%
Organizations that feel highly confident they can prevent NHI attacks

Understanding the NHI risk

In today's enterprise environments, the majority of identities accessing systems and resources are no longer human — they're machines. These non-human identities (NHIs) — service accounts, applications, API keys, bots, agentic AI, scripts, and more — form the backbone of modern business operations. They enable automation, integration, and cloud operations that drive digital transformation.

Yet they remain largely unmanaged, invisible, and over-permissioned. In fact, a recent study showed 85% of organizations are not highly confident in their ability to prevent NHI attacks.

Why? Because while organizations have spent decades refining their approach to human identity management, NHIs have proliferated in the background with minimal governance. Traditional IAM tools, created primarily to support human identities, were never designed to handle the unique challenges posed by machine identities operating across hybrid environments.

The sprawling, ungoverned web of NHIs represents cybersecurity's fastest-growing blind spot — and an increasingly popular entry point for attackers. With the rise of AI (and agentic AI in particular), this problem is growing exponentially. Tools like GitHub Copilot and other AI assistants are dramatically increasing the creation of NHIs — often without any of the identity governance or lifecycle management that covers human identities.

Strategic snapshot

The challenge:

Non-human identities (NHIs) now outnumber human users by 80:1 in enterprise environments, creating a massive, largely invisible attack surface.

Why it happens:

Traditional identity management tools weren’t designed for NHIs operating across hybrid ecosystems. The lack of visibility and stewardship allows NHIs to accumulate excessive permissions and use persistent credentials buried in code or configurations.

The solution:

Unified identity security that provides comprehensive visibility, intelligent governance, and rapid remediation for both human and non-human identities.

How NHIs fall through the gaps

Unmanaged and often overprovisioned NHIs create significant business exposure that goes beyond typical security concerns:

Why it matters: Business-critical impacts

Unmanaged and often overprovisioned NHIs create significant business exposure that goes beyond typical security concerns:

  • Overprovisioning and credentials in code. NHIs are frequently granted far more access than required. This rampant overprovisioning is compounded by poor credential hygiene management — like credentials buried in code or configurations — creating persistent and unmonitored backdoors.
  • Toxic combinations & undetected lateral movement. The interplay between human identities and NHIs can create “toxic combinations” where individual vulnerabilities escalate into critical exposures. Whether a compromised NHI gains control or a breached human identity exploits an NHI, the result allows bad, combined actors to potentially gain access to critical resources — often beyond the detection of traditional IAm solutions.
  • Compliance & governance failures. NHIs often operate outside established governance frameworks. They lack clear ownership, structured lifecycle management, and regular access reviews.
  • Operational disruption. As organizations become increasingly dependent on automation and AI, unmanaged NHIs introduce operational and security risks that can disrupt critical business functions. In fact, security incidents involving NHIs are particularly challenging to investigate and remediate due to limited visibility and unclear ownership.
  • Innovation barriers. Security concerns around NHIs can slow digital transformation initiatives. Without a robust framework for managing machine identities, organizations must choose between business agility and security assurance — a false choice that constrains business potential.

VISIBILITY GAPS

Limited inventory capability:
Most organizations cannot answer the fundamental question: Which NHIs exist, and who owns them? This visibility gap in complex on-prem, cloud, and hybrid enterprise environments hinders IAM and security teams from establishing the desired security posture and enforcing transparent governance.
Unique complexities:
NHIs span diverse technical implementations — machine accounts, service accounts, applications, API keys, tokens, AI models — each with distinct behaviors.
Rapid proliferation:
NHIs outnumber human identities by orders of magnitude, creating significant blind spots.
Complex lateral attack paths:
Compromised human identities often lead to NHI compromise (and vice-versa), enabling lateral movements that are difficult to identify and trace with traditional tools.

Agentic AI amplifies — and transforms — the NHI problem

The rapid emergence of agentic AI amplifies existing NHI risks. But agentic AI also transforms the NHI challenge in a critical way: unlike traditional NHIs that operate in a deterministic manner — executing predefined actions with predictable outcomes — AI-powered identities function non-deterministically, making autonomous decisions based on learning and context that can vary with each execution.

This fundamental shift from predictable to unpredictable behavior creates an entirely new security paradigm. When a traditional service account accesses a database, security teams can model the exact actions it will take. With AI-driven NHIs, that predictability disappears, introducing novel risks that conventional security controls weren't designed to address. This is a growing reality that, if not addressed proactively and effectively now, will soon become a crisis for every enterprise.

Advancing autonomy increases economic value — and business risk

As agentic AI progresses — from simple query-based assistants to more sophisticated GenAI copilots and ultimately toward truly autonomous agents operating without a human in the loop — their economic and business value grows. But this increasing autonomy also escalates the complexity of the identity and access challenges:

The path forward: Essential capabilities to secure NHIs

Organizations can close a critical identity security gap by bringing both non-human and human identities under a single intelligent framework. NHI access can be continuously monitored, right-sized, and enforced with least-privilege principles, enabling businesses to move faster, innovate boldly, and stay secure.

To effectively secure NHIs, organizations need:

Comprehensive discovery of NHIs across environments with fine-grained visibility down to the permission and resource level.

Lifecycle management including access review, proper onboarding, credential rotation and timely offboarding.

Rapid remediation capabilities to neutralize suspicious activity in seconds, not days or weeks.

GOVERNANCE CHALLENGES

Lack of stewardship:
NHIs frequently lack clear human ownership, making it difficult to assign accountability and drive corrective action.
Over-privileging by default:
NHIs are granted excessive permissions due to coarse-grained legacy systems, reuse across multiple resources, or just developer convenience.
Delegation without audit:
NHIs perform tasks on behalf of humans without transparent chains of responsibility. 
Highly privileged by design:
Many NHIs operate with broad, highly privileged access to multiple resources by necessity.
Persistent credentials:
NHIs often rely on hard-coded or long-lived credentials buried in code or configurations, creating hidden and persistent risks that are hard to detect, rotate, or manage

The Oleria Approach

Oleria's Trustfusion platform addresses these challenges through a graph-native architecture that connects to identity providers and applications across on-premises, SaaS, cloud, and hybrid environments. It unifies accounts, groups, resources, and permissions into a single access graph enriched with fine-grained usage insights.

Oleria enables organizations to:

  • Discover NHIs with unparalleled visibility in minutes across the entire identity ecosystem
  • Govern NHIs intelligently to find and fix over-permissioned, dormant, or ownerless identities.
  • Remediate in seconds to reduce NHI risks with recommended actions.

From blind spot to strategic advantage

Securing NHIs isn't just about closing a security loophole — it's about re-architecting identity security for a future where machines act with autonomy and impact at scale. Organizations addressing this challenge now will gain security and competitive advantages in an increasingly automated world.

The rise of agentic AI and automation means NHIs will continue to grow in importance and risk. Enterprises that wait to address this will be left vulnerable, while those who act now can get ahead of the curve.

Download PDF

Build your future-ready identity
security solution with Oleria