Related articles
At any reasonably-sized engineering org, the most sensitive access might be the internal admin dashboard that can modify any customer's account, the customer support tool with full read access to the production database, the ML feature store with PII-grade training data, the billing service with direct write access to payment records.
Identity vendors with hundreds of SaaS connectors don't cover these apps. The connector catalog stops at SaaS. The result is a governance gap that audit teams consistently find: internal admin tools with broad access, no access reviews, and no visibility into who holds what role.
Oleria's native integration closes the gap without waiting for a vendor to build a connector. The internal app registers its identity model with Oleria - users, roles, access grants - and those identities flow into the same governance surface as every SaaS and cloud app. The engineering team wires it up; the governance program extends to cover it.
Oleria's native integration gives your engineering team everything needed to connect any internal application's identity model to the same governance graph, access review workflows, and audit trails as your SaaS stack.
The security team runs a quarterly access review. Salesforce, GitHub, AWS - all in scope, all in the graph. But the internal admin dashboard that can modify any customer record, the customer support tool with full database read, and the ML platform with PII training data are not in scope. They have never been reviewed. The team knows it is a gap but there is no connector and no timeline to build one.
The engineering team wires up the three internal apps using Oleria's native integration - a day of work each. Users, roles, and access grants are registered. At the next quarterly review, all three apps are in the review queue alongside the SaaS stack. A senior engineer with admin rights in the internal dashboard who moved to a different team three months ago is caught in the review. The access is revoked. The apps that held the most sensitive access in the org are finally in the governance program.
Hours to days for most apps. The integration library provides the data model and handles communication with Oleria; our AI tool helps with the identity model for a specific app.
Where the app exposes APIs for identity data, a connector pattern works similarly to SaaS connectors. Without API or source access, the integration path depends on the app's architecture - speak to the Oleria team about the specific case.
SSO via your IdP provides the user identity at login. The native integration adds the in-app authorization context - what roles and access grants the user holds inside the app - that Oleria needs for governance. The two are complementary, not redundant.
Yes. Once an internal app is connected to Oleria, its access reviews, access change events, and governance actions all appear in the same audit log as SaaS and cloud apps. Compliance evidence covers the full stack, not just the vendor-supported connectors.
